Does the good Senator from California want just to ban “assault weapons” or does she want to take away a whole lot more? I came across this video tonight that compares what she says now, to a video taken of her right after the 1994 “assault weapon” ban.
I think it’s clear that Feinstein wants your AR-15, your Glock, your Grand Dads deer rifle, and anything else that throws lead at a high rate of speed.
What makes this woman tick? Why is she on such a vendetta to take away the rights of law abiding citizens?
The answer comes back to November 27, 1978 when Feinstein was working in the City Hall in San Fransisco, CA, and a deranged madman assassinated the mayor, and another employee of the city. Feinstein had the unfortunate luck of being one of the first people to discover the bodies.
What isn’t often said about this horrible crime, is that the shooter did not use an “assault weapon”, no, he used a revolver. The “assault weapon” term has been, and is currently being used to divide gun owners into groups, so the deer hunters say “I don’t have an assault weapon, this legislation won’t effect me!” so they do nothing to stop it.
We need to band together as gun owners, whether you have a “assault weapon” or not, we need to remain united! As soon as “assault weapons” are banned, you can rest assured they will come after the deer hunters “high powered sniper rifles” as well.
Just as Feinstein said in the above video:
“If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America turn them all in, I would have done it.”
Don’t let semantics divide us. Call, email, and write letters. We must not let any ban legislation pass, our very freedom depends on it.